KIN6005 Statistical Analysis Studio

Credits & citation

Created by Jacob Goodin, PhD, Goodin Performance, for KIN6005 statistical analysis education.

Software implementation was assisted by OpenAI Codex. Visualizations use D3; the interface uses React. Example datasets are synthetic unless you upload your own data.

Cite this studio

Goodin, J. (2026). KIN6005 statistical analysis studio [Computer software]. Goodin Performance. https://stats.plnusportscience.com/

Suggested in-text citation: (Goodin, 2026). Add your access date when your assignment requires it. Describe the specific analysis and its assumptions in your methods section.

Methods and reporting

The question-mark buttons, assumptions sections, and APA reporting guides explain the methods and limits of each analysis.

APA reporting guide

Use the results as parts of a report. Explain the study design, variables, units, missing data, and assumptions. Include effect estimates and confidence intervals where available. Do not invent an interval that this tool does not estimate.

ICC. Name the one- or two-way model, agreement or consistency, single or average unit, number of measurements, participant count, ICC, and interval method and level. This tool uses a participant bootstrap.

Agreement. Report B − A bias and its CI, then limits of agreement and their CIs separately. State whether the scale is raw or log. Approximately 95% limits of agreement are not 95% confidence intervals for the mean.

Measurement error. Distinguish measurement SEM from the SE of a mean. Define the typical error, CV, and MDC assumptions. A detectable change is not necessarily an important change.

Report exact p values to three decimals, or p < .001. Omit leading zeros for probabilities and correlations. Use italics for Latin statistical symbols; keep Greek symbols upright. Precision should suit the measurement scale.

APA numbers and statistics guide · APA reporting standards

Reliability of single and averaged measurements

Source: Simulated measurement study. This analysis uses 40 of 40 rows; Excluded rows: 0 (unselected groups or missing/invalid selected values).

Inspect input rows

First 12 rows (before exclusions)

First 12 rows (before exclusions)
Device ADevice BDevice C
45.34148.01448.163
51.47260.13549.594
50.82552.12946.970
40.59345.24840.315
40.59346.73342.334
32.55140.04632.841
51.27258.04455.503
47.76150.70344.175
50.06258.43254.250
40.24748.77345.605
52.31654.85252.048
44.73044.72643.352
ICC(2,1)
.79
95% bootstrap ICC interval
.69 to .85
Measurement SEM
3.24
Model-based MDC95
8.99

ICC(2, 1) = .79, 95% participant-bootstrap CI [.69, .85]. The estimate uses 40 complete participants and 3 measurements. SEM = 3.24.

Variance components behind the selected ICC

Variance components behind the selected ICC
Between-person MSMeasurement MSResidual MSWithin-person MS
124.54250.194.3810.52

The ICC is not clipped to zero. A negative method-variance component is set to zero for the SEM calculation only; the original ANOVA ICC estimate is retained.

Try this: Increase between-person SD while holding measurement-error SD fixed. Then add a fixed bias to Device B.

Explain what happens

More participant heterogeneity can raise ICC without improving measurement precision. A fixed device offset lowers absolute agreement more than consistency. Correlation can remain high even when devices are not interchangeable.

Assumptions and method

Independent participants and complete crossed measurements for two-way ICC. Generalizing beyond sampled raters requires a random-rater design; consistency for these fixed raters has a different scope. Single and average units must match the intended use. Bootstrap intervals resample participants, not measurement cells.

Read the method reference

Agreement, bias, and individual differences

Agreement uses 40 complete Device A–Device B pairs. ICC may use a different number of participants because it requires every selected measurement.

Bland–Altman: B minus A versus pair average−5051035404550556046.68, 2.6755.80, 8.6651.48, 1.3042.92, 4.6543.66, 6.1436.30, 7.4954.66, 6.7749.23, 2.9454.25, 8.3744.51, 8.5353.58, 2.5444.73, -0.0051.86, 4.5656.52, 7.9341.97, 2.2648.02, 4.1450.42, 7.7349.50, 7.6334.79, 2.1248.00, 3.0144.05, 0.4644.24, 2.8354.74, 0.3349.23, 4.4246.85, 1.4658.35, 0.6548.80, 3.4756.82, 4.3752.36, 5.4150.43, 5.3042.30, 1.5347.28, 0.2060.59, 7.0449.53, 2.2459.63, 4.7736.52, 5.7053.64, 1.5937.30, 7.1540.17, 2.9845.49, 1.16Average of A and BB − A

Horizontal: Average of A and B. Vertical: B − A.

Bland–Altman: B minus A versus pair average
Export APA PNG

The export uses your selected graph colors and Arial, with 10-point graph labels and an 11-point caption at 6.5 inches wide (300 dpi). Check variable units, title case, and the note before downloading. Custom captions persist until you reset them.

Transparent exports keep dark text and are intended for light backgrounds. Grayscale removes color from the entire figure, including the legend. Check group labels and line styles.

Turn this off if you will add the caption in your manuscript. Match your manuscript’s figure numbering and caption font. A figure does not replace a complete statistical report.

Reference lines: bias 4.06, lower limit -1.14, upper limit 9.27, meaningful-change bounds ±5. The log plot uses log units; the table below reports back-transformed ratios.

Bias and approximate 95% limits of agreement

Bias and approximate 95% limits of agreement
QuantityEstimate95% CI lower95% CI upper
Mean B − A4.063.214.91
Lower agreement limit-1.14-2.610.32
Upper agreement limit9.277.8010.73
Pearson correlation
.92
Typical error
1.88
Approximate CV (%)
3.88
Difference-versus-mean slope
0.05

Pairwise MDC95 is 5.21 units, versus the chosen meaningful-change threshold of 5.00. The estimated detectable change is larger than the chosen important change. Systematic bias must be considered separately.

Try this: Increase Device B's fixed bias. Watch Pearson r, the mean difference, and the agreement limits.

Explain what happens

A fixed bias can leave correlation nearly unchanged while shifting all differences. Device interchangeability depends on whether individual discrepancies are acceptable, not whether r is large or a bias test is nonsignificant.

Assumptions and method

Independent participant pairs; approximately normal differences with constant spread for original-scale limits. Log limits assume roughly constant multiplicative error and normal log differences. LoA confidence intervals use a t-based large-sample approximation. Repeated trials per person require an extended agreement model. Detectable change is not evidence of clinical importance.

Read the method reference